Well, not surprisingly chapters 2 and 3 went along much like
the first. I was left admiring Juha’s quick witted comebacks even though in
these sections they were increasingly harsh and critical. Once again, all of
the stories were extremely relatable, giving them a much more personal feel. As
expected, I generally loved all of the short 3-4 liners such as the one on page
45 about his wife’s lack of brains. Next, came probably the two most relatable
pieces in the novel so far. The first is on page 46 and is the one about
relationship baggage and how at night there’s 4 people in the couple’s bed, the
husband, the wife, the husband’s late wife, and the wife’s late husband. Now,
the deceased part is hopefully well beyond our years, but who can’t relate to
past relationship baggage ruining a current relationship? Everyone has
experienced it in one way or another. While thinking about this story, I came
to realization that I think this is what makes Juha such a relatable and
enjoyable character at least in my perspective. Juha has been in virtually
every situation you can think of, the good, the bad, the awkward, and the
terrible. I think that this is his most endearing characteristic because
it allows everyone, regardless of their background, to find something about
Juha that they can relate to.
On to the next story which is on page 48. This is probably
the piece that I have most agreed with and been able to relate to so far. It is
the one about the father and the son and their donkey. When the father is
riding the donkey and the son is walking people think the father is being rude
to the son. When the son is on the donkey and the father is walking people
think the son is being rude to the father. When they both ride the donkey
people think they are treating the donkey poorly. When they both walk, people
think they are stupid for not riding the donkey. And finally, when the two
decide to carry the donkey, people think they are being imbeciles. Obviously,
the moral of the story is that you can never please anyone which is very
applicable to everyday life and an internal conflict that many of us face daily.
Another story that I really enjoyed was the one where Juha
sold his entire house besides one nail. I felt that this story was a particularly
good example of Juha embodying the trickster figure. Also, it gave me a good belly-laugh.
Next, came chapter 4, which for me, provided quite the
cognitive shift. Admittedly, I skipped the title page for the chapter so I was
not expecting for the stories to shift from Juha being all knowing and full of
wit to naïve and stupid. Even though it’s a completely different kind of humor,
self-depreciating on the part of Juha if you will, I still thoroughly enjoyed
this section. My favorites were the ones about the pigeons flying out of his
hands, his wife asking for the matches on his left, the miscounting of the
donkeys, and the proclamation that his daughter was six months pregnant. I feel
like it is due to the precedent set in previous chapters that these stories
include cognitive shifts. Throughout the first three chapters, Juha is the
wittiest character I have ever read about and seems to 99% of the time get the
upper hand. Obviously, that trend does not continue in chapter four but for
some reason, time after time I expected that it would hence the continual
cognitive shifts. I can't think of the word, but in this section, he clearly encompasses the naive and lacking-in-common-sense character who is generally the brunt of most comedies. No offense to Juha, but in chapter 4 he slowly but surely began
to remind me of current figures in pop culture who have made a living off of
being mind-numbingly stupid (Snooki to be specific).
I, too, particularly enjoyed the story with the father, son, and donkey. I think I appreciated that one more than others because there is an obvious message behind the story. Many Juha stories make fun of women, use play on words to get out of a situation, or use wit to get the upper hand, but few have a definitive meaning other than to make someone laugh. “‘You can never please anyone!’ is a very good lesson that people should learn; living your life to please everyone usually results in everyone unhappy and you stressed out. The message is so pertinent that I tried to imagine how it would be amended to American culture to give the same message. What would the donkey be? As relatable as these stories are, especially those that contain wit and play on words instead of social commentary on women or marriage, I feel like some of the meaning is always lost because of the extreme differences in culture between the Middle East and America.
ReplyDelete